People every day subject their beloved pets to monotonous, repetitive routines that they wouldn't allow for themselves. Yet, they unthinkingly pass these actions off as being beneficial for their pets.
People pour food out of a box into the bowls of their pets every day. Pets get the same food day in and day out. This strange phenomenon is widely practiced by loving pet owners who believe they are doing the right thing.
Why? It is convenient. But also, the labels indicate that these foods are "completely balanced," "100% complete" or have passed numerous analytical and feeding testing standards. Furthermore, manufacturers, and even veterinarians, counsel pet owners about not feeding other foods, such as table scraps, because of the danger of unbalancing these modern processed nutritional marvels. The power of the message is so great that pet owners en masse do every day to their pets what they would never do to themselves or their children - force-feed the same processed food at every meal.
It's amazing, just think about it. Our world is complex beyond comprehension. It is difficult to comprehend, and it is also difficult to know in the "complete" sense. To produce "100% complete, balanced and balanced" pet food, nutritionists and manufacturers must be 100% knowledgeable about nutrition. Nutrition is not an exact science. Nutrition is an aggregate science that is based on other sciences such as biology, chemistry, and physics. However, no scientist would claim that all of biology, chemistry, and physics are known. How can nutritionists claim to be able to understand nutrition, which is based on these sciences? This is why the claim of a "100% balanced and complete" diet is absurd. This is why a similar attempt to feed babies a 100 percent complete formula proved to be disastrous for their health.
In that instance, after sufficient disease and death resulted from attempting to retire the human breast to a mere appendage of adornment, government stepped in and controlled the commercial hype. Now doctors, nurses and purveyors of baby formulas cannot say these products are complete or that they are equal to or superior to breast-feeding. Good for the regulators. (They should have been proactive in preventing the disaster from ever taking root and not just intervened after there were enough deaths.
Pet food regulators continue to ignore this warning. Instead of preventing pet food producers from claiming a processed food concoction is 100% complete, they in effect promote the death and disease-dealing specious claim by setting bogus standards that supposedly justify and authenticate the claim. They legitimize sloppy science in order to win consumer confidence. A manufacturer only needs to guarantee that the food's percentage of protein, fat, and other nutrients meets yarra junction produce pet supplies National Research Council standards. Alternative options include feeding tests on laboratory animals in a cage for a few days, measuring blood parameters and monitoring growth and weight.